Dafatirالعربية

The Most Prolific Arabic Poets, and Why They Are Not the Most Famous

This is an attempt to rank Arabic poets by how much of their work has reached us. The ranking itself is less interesting than what it exposes: in Arabic poetry, volume and reputation are two lines that barely intersect.

The twenty most prolific

# Poet Poems
1 Ibn al-Rumi 2,012
2 Ibn Nubata al-Misri 1,726
3 Abu al-Ala al-Maarri 1,609
4 Hasan Husni al-Tuwayrani 1,394
5 Ibn al-Wardi 1,182
6 Abu Nuwas 1,171
7 al-Sharif al-Uqayli 981
8 Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi 965
9 al-Buhturi 923
10 Muhyi al-Din ibn Arabi 917
11 Safi al-Din al-Hilli 892
12 al-Ahnaf al-Ukbari 819
13 al-Farazdaq 779
14 Salah al-Din al-Safadi 778
15 Abu al-Atahiya 751
16 Lisan al-Din ibn al-Khatib 746
17 Ibn al-Mutazz 741
18 Abu al-Fath al-Busti 728
19 al-Sanawbari 691
20 al-Qadi al-Fadil 683

Those twenty alone carry about a quarter of the entire archive — 25.8% of 79,268 poems.

The paradox

Now look at where the most celebrated names in Arabic poetry actually fall:

Poet Rank Poems
Hassan ibn Thabit 60 367
al-Mutanabbi 68 322
Jarir 81 289
Antara ibn Shaddad 173 118
al-Khansa 194 99
Imru al-Qays 266 65
Zuhayr ibn Abi Sulma 298 53
Tarafa ibn al-Abd 385 34
al-Harith ibn Hilliza 479 17

al-Mutanabbi — who cannot be left out of any account of Arabic poetry — sits sixty-eighth. Imru al-Qays, author of the most famous Mu’allaqa in the language, sits two hundred and sixty-sixth. al-Harith ibn Hilliza, one of the seven, survives in seventeen poems.

The reason is plain enough. Reputation in Arabic poetry is built on lines that circulate, not on volumes that sit. A single line of al-Mutanabbi is repeated more often than another poet’s complete collected works.

Who the prolific actually are

Ibn al-Rumi leads with two thousand poems, and was known for a long breath — it was said of him that he exhausted a thought so thoroughly that he left nothing in it for anyone else. Abu al-Ala al-Maarri is third; his Luzumiyyat alone runs past a thousand pieces, composed under a self-imposed rhyme constraint stricter than the form required.

Notice that most of the top twenty belong to the Abbasid and late eras. That is not because they were better poets. It is because their eras are nearer and writing was well established by then, so their work survived whole. Of the pre-Islamic poets, only what lodged in the memories of transmitters came through at all.

The table, in other words, measures what survived, not what was said.

The median poet

The middle poet in this archive has about 56 poems. The distance between that poet and the leader is enormous — a factor of thirty-six — which is the shape every human archive tends to take: a small number of contributors holding most of the volume.

How these figures were read

They are taken from the poet pages on Qafiyah: 573 poets holding 79,268 poems. Poem counts were collected per poet and sorted.

Two cautions belong with the table:

  • It ranks quantity, not value. It makes no claim that Ibn al-Rumi is a better poet than al-Mutanabbi.
  • It ranks what reached us. More pre-Islamic poetry was lost than survived, and had it survived the whole table would look different.

Each poet has their own page, and their work can also be browsed by meter, rhyme or theme.

Back to the blog